SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 1546

N.K.GUPTA
Sita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Manik Chandra Sahu – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: B.K. Bais.
For the Respondent: P.K. Saxena.

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code the applicants have challenged the order dated 23-3-2007 passed in Criminal Revision No. 214/2005 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Waidhan District Sidhi and also the order dated 17-10-2005 passed in Criminal Case No. 481/2004 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Waidhan whereby the maintenance directed against the applicants was set aside.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicants were given a maintenance of Rs. 800/- and Rs. 500/- and Rs. 300/- respectively vide order dated 17.6.2004 passed by the learned JMFC Waidhan and that order was affirmed in Criminal Revision No. 214/2005 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Waidhan vide order dated 23-3-2007 and execution proceeding was pending before the trial Court.

3. The respondent has filed an application before the trial Court that he transferred some land to the applicant No. 3, and therefore the proceeding may be dropped. The learned JMFC Waidhan vide order dated 17-10-2005 found that the execution proceeding filed by the applicant No. 3 was fully satisfied, and therefore it was directed that the proceeding may be dropped. In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top