SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 1123

JARAT KUMAR JAIN
RAMESH CHANDRA s/o NIRBHAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Akash Rathi
For the Respondent: Mukesh Parwal

JUDGMENT :

1. Shri Akash Rathi, learned Counsel for the applicants. Shri Mukesh Parwal, learned Government Advocate for the non-applicant/State.

2. Heard on IA No. 2717/2016, an application for suspension of conviction of applicant No. 1 Rameshchandra.

3. Applicant No. 1 Rameshchandra, his son Santosh, wife Shyamabai, son Devendra and daughter Mamta have been convicted for the offence under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year’s RI and fine of Rs. 300/- with default clause.

4. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant No. 1 is father-in-law of the complainant Rajeshwari and he was in Government service on the post of Assistant Grade-III in District Trade and Industries Center, Shajapur. The applicant’s sentence has already been suspended by this Court vide order dated 29-10-2013. During pendency of this Revision applicant No. 1 was dismissed from his service vide order dated 26-3-2016 on the ground that he has been convicted for aforesaid offence. However, he was due for retirement on 31-3-2016. It is contended that the applicant No. 1 has maintained a good conduct and character through out his service. The conviction under section 498-A of In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top