JARAT KUMAR JAIN
RAMESH CHANDRA s/o NIRBHAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Shri Akash Rathi, learned Counsel for the applicants. Shri Mukesh Parwal, learned Government Advocate for the non-applicant/State.
2. Heard on IA No. 2717/2016, an application for suspension of conviction of applicant No. 1 Rameshchandra.
3. Applicant No. 1 Rameshchandra, his son Santosh, wife Shyamabai, son Devendra and daughter Mamta have been convicted for the offence under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year’s RI and fine of Rs. 300/- with default clause.
4. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant No. 1 is father-in-law of the complainant Rajeshwari and he was in Government service on the post of Assistant Grade-III in District Trade and Industries Center, Shajapur. The applicant’s sentence has already been suspended by this Court vide order dated 29-10-2013. During pendency of this Revision applicant No. 1 was dismissed from his service vide order dated 26-3-2016 on the ground that he has been convicted for aforesaid offence. However, he was due for retirement on 31-3-2016. It is contended that the applicant No. 1 has maintained a good conduct and character through out his service. The conviction under section 498-A of In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.