SHIV DAYAL
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
TRIVENI PRASAD – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This is a reference under section 438, Criminal Procedure Code, arising from proceedings under section 145, Criminal Procedure Code. The only question for determination is whether affidavits sworn by witnesses and parties to proceedings under section 145, Criminal Procedure Code before a Magistrate other than the Magistrate who took cognizance of the proceedings under section 145, can be read in such proceedings. The question has arisen in these circumstances.
2. Jamuna Prasad (hereinafter called party No. 1) moved Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sakti, under section 145, Criminal Procedure Code, that the house in dispute was in his exclusive possession and that Triveni Prasad, his wife, Mst. Premabai, and his son, Ram Shankar (together hereinafter called party No. 2), forcibly took its possession and that there was an apprehension of breach of the peace. Party No. 2 denied the allegations and alleged that party No. 1 was not in exclusive possession of the house, and that the house was in joint possession of party No. 1 and party No. 2, and further that there was no apprehension of breach of the peace. Statements, affidavits and documents were put in by the parties. The Sub-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.