SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 387

SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
Omnarayan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
U.K.Bohre, for petitioner;
Ankur Modi, Additional Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

Pathak, J. -- 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner as Pro Bono Publico projecting himself to be a public spirited citizen and has raised the grievance regarding illegality and irregularity committed by the respondents, especially respondents No. 6 to 13 who according to petitioner have not undertaken any enquiry over the complaint of petitioner regarding corruption / illegality committed in construction of toilets under Swachh Bharat Mission.

2. Counsel for the petitioner has sought following reliefs:--

^^1- Áfr;kfpdkdrkZ Øekad 1 yxk;r 13 dks vkns'k@funsZ'k fn;k tk, fd ftyk fHk.M ds vUrxZr 6 tuin iapk;r] vVsj] esgxkao] fHk.M] xksg] jksu ,oa ygkj ds vUrxZr 'kkSpky; fuekZ.k esa gq;s Hkz"Vkpkj dh tkap fdlh fu"i{k ,tsUlh@vf/kdkjh ls djk;h tk, rFkk mDr Hkz"Vkpkj esa lafyIr vf/kdkfj;ksa@deZpkfj;ksa ds fo:) dkuwuh dk;Zokgh dh tk,A

2- Áfr;kfpdkdrkZ Øekad 1 yxk;r 13 dks vkns'k@funsZ'k fn;k tk, fd mDr 'kkSpky; fuekZ.k esa gq, Hkz"Vkpkj ls 'kklu dks tks gkfu gqbZ gS mldh olwyh nks"kh vf/kdkjh@ deZpkfj;ksa ls dh tk,A

3- vU; U;k;ksfpr lgk;rk tks Ádj.k dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds vuq:i mfpr gks og ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk ;kfpdkdrkZ ds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top