SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 344

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Vijay Energy Equipments – Appellant
Versus
West Central Railway – Respondent


Advocates:
Tabrez Sheikh for applicant; Atul Coudhari for respondent.

ORDER

1. This application has been filed by applicant – M/s Vijay Energy Equipments under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Act”) with the prayer that this Court may appoint an independent Arbitrator as the applicable clause in the agreement between the parties is in conflict with the prevailing law.

2. According to the case set up by the applicant in the application, the respondent-Railways issued a tender on 5.7.2013 inviting bids for construction of ROB No.152/2 at Ch 152550 (New No.150/3 Ch 150627) with 2x18 m + 1x36 m composite girder including sub-structure and superstructure over NH-75 and allied works in connection with LAR-KHJB new B.G. Rail line project with approximate cost Rs.599 Lacs. The applicant also participated in the process of tender and was eventually awarded the work. The applicant submitted a bank guarantee of Rs.31,24,550/- before the respondent. An agreement was executed between the parties on 16.6.2014. However, the respondent failed to provide the approved drawing in time despite his several requests. The applicant sent a letter on 28.7.2016 requesting that the drawing may be sent so that the work can commence. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top