Back
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Vijay Energy Equipments – Appellant
Versus
West Central Railway – Respondent
ORDER
1. This application has been filed by applicant – M/s Vijay Energy Equipments under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the Act”) with the prayer that this Court may appoint an independent Arbitrator as the applicable clause in the agreement between the parties is in conflict with the prevailing law.
2. According to the case set up by the applicant in the application, the respondent-Railways issued a tender on 5.7.2013 inviting bids for construction of ROB No.152/2 at Ch 152550 (New No.150/3 Ch 150627) with 2x18 m + 1x36 m composite girder including sub-structure and superstructure over NH-75 and allied works in connection with LAR-KHJB new B.G. Rail line project with approximate cost Rs.599 Lacs. The applicant also participated in the process of tender and was eventually awarded the work. The applicant submitted a bank guarantee of Rs.31,24,550/- before the respondent. An agreement was executed between the parties on 16.6.2014. However, the respondent failed to provide the approved drawing in time despite his several requests. The applicant sent a letter on 28.7.2016 requesting that the drawing may be sent so that the work can commence. The
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the procedure for appointing arbitrators under the amended Act and the modified Clause 64 of the GCC, emphasizing the ineligibility of certain ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that parties may waive the applicability of Section 12 (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 by their conduct, and the appointment of an ....
The court established that the modified provisions of the General and Special Conditions of Contract (GCC) regarding the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal were applicable in railway contracts, an....
The court affirmed that the claimant must secure the necessary Airport Entry Permits and upheld the arbitration award, ruling no breach by the respondent; consent regarding the arbitrator's appointme....
The appointment of an arbitrator must comply with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly Section 12(5), which disqualifies certain individuals from serving as arbitrators.
An employee of the respondent or even a retired employee would be ineligible to be appointed as an arbitrator. The panel of arbitrators should be broad-based and should include persons with diverse b....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of impartiality and independence of arbitrators, as well as the need for a balanced approach to arbitration, as emphasized by the in....
2020 Rules which came into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, i.e. 12.02.2020, cannot be given retrospective effect. The intention of Government of India to make the 20....
The court reinforced that impartiality and independence of arbitrators is essential, disqualifying those with vested interests under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
