SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 467

SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
Tulsi Narayan Garg – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Rural Road Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S. Raghuvanshi for petitioner; Vivek Khedkar for respondents.

ORDER

Pathak J;

1. The present petition is preferred under Article 226 of Constitution of India, being crestfallen by action/inaction of the respondents whereby security deposit of petitioner company has not been refunded despite issuing completion certificate as well as utility certificate by the competent authority.

2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was given a contract for construction of T-05 (Dhoti) to Asida Road, Ashida to Kamarsali Road, L-04 to Dubri and Dubri to Gurunavda. Work was completed and so as the 5 years maintenance period. Since completion certificate was issued on 22.3.2013 and defect liability period of 5 years was also completed successfully which is evident from the report of inspection team issued in this regard by way of utility certificate (Annexure P/3), therefore, petitioner has right to get his performance guarantee to the tune of Rs.19,37,900/- which is required to be refunded under the contract. Since same has not been refunded, therefore, petitioner is before this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed the order dated 30.8.2019 passed by the apex Court in Civil Appeal No(s).6726-6729 of 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top