G.S.AHLUWALIA
Pooran Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Saroj Sharma – Respondent
ORDER
1. This application under section 482 of CrPC has been filed against the order dated 30.7.2019 passed by Vth Additional Sessions Judge, to the Court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge Vidisha in Criminal Revision No. 6/2019, by which the order dated 15.3.2019 passed by J.M.F.C., Vidisha in Criminal Case No. 2061/2015 has been set aside and the respondent has been permitted to cross examine the applicant/complainant.
2. The necessary facts for disposal of present application in short are that the applicant has filed a criminal complaint under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
3. By order dated 12.7.2016, the trial Magistrate, directed that in the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Indian Bank Association v. Union of India reported in (2014) 5 SCC 590, the respondent may file an application seeking permission to cross examine the complainant. However, no such application was filed. Thereafter, 20.10.2016, it was held by the trial Magistrate, that since, the respondent has not sought permission to cross examine the complainant, therefore, permission can not be granted and accordingly, the case was fixed for examination of the respondent under se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.