R. K. Vijaywargiya, J.
Chandabai v. Mangilal
Cr. R. No. 436 of 1981 (I); Decided on 17-2-1984.
The trial court held that the applicant failed to prove that non-applicant treated her with cruelty or that she had a justifiable reason for Li"Ving separately from her husband. In this view of the matter the application submitted by the applicant was dismissed. Aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court the applicant-wife has submitted this revision.
Held : Having heard learned counsel for the applicant I have come to the conclusion that this revision deserves to be dismissed. The trial court held that the testimony of the applicant and the witnesses examined by her to prove the fact that the applicant was treated with cruelty and was turned out of the marital home by the non-applicant was not trustworthy.
The finding recorded by the trial court is based on appreciation of evidence. No illegality or impropriety is shown to have been committed by the trial Court in recording the said finding. I, therefore, see no reason to interfere with the finding recorded by the trial Court. As the applicant failed to prove that she had any justifiable reason for Li"Ving separately from the non-applicant her claim for maintenance was rightly dismissed by the trial Court.
The learned counsel for the applicant contended that the trial Court atleast should have awarded maintenance in respect of the minor son Sanjay Kumar.
This contention is not well founded. It does not appear from the order passed by the trial Court that the claim for maintenance of Sanjay Kumar was seriously pressed before the trial Court. I, therefore do not think it necessary to consider this matter in this revision. Revision dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.