Back
R.C. Lahoti and Shacheendra Dwivedi, JJ.
Subhash v. State of M.P.
M.P. No. 75 of 1992 (G); Decided on 20.2.1992
cafn;ksa dks ifjlhek ij NksM+s tkuk fu;e] 1964 ¼e-iz-½ & fu- 4 & &5 o"kZ dk djkokl Hkksxk tkuk & ifjoh{kk ij NksM+s tkus ds fy, vkosnu ij fopkj dh rkjh[k rd fxuk tkuk pkfg,A
The petitioner's application for release on probation under the M.P. Prisoners Release on Probation Rules, 1964 was rejected on 1/2-8-90 on the ground that on the date of making the application i.e., 14.5.1988, the prisoner had not served out five years out of the sentence of imprisonment. Clearly, the probation Board was mistaken inasmuch as under rule 4 of the Probation Rules, the period of five years should have been calculated upto the date of consideration and not up to the date of the application. In other words, if the period of five years was not completed on the date of the application but was completed on the date on which the application came up for consideration, then it cannot be said that the prayer for release on probation was premature.
For the foregoing reasons, the petition is allowed. The order dated 1/2-8-90 (Annex. R/1) in so far as it rejects the petitioner's application for release on probation is set aside. The application shall be deemed to be pending which shall be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. Disposed of accordingly.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
