1993 Supreme(MP) 301
D.K.JAIN
Virnal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Siya Bai – Respondent
Advocates:
Masood Ali for applicant; G. S. Baghel for non-applicant.
Judgement Key Points
- The first proviso to Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. mandates that no warrant for recovery of maintenance arrears shall issue unless an application is made within one year from the date the amount became due. (!)
- Arrears of maintenance exceeding one year cannot be enforced through recovery proceedings. (!)
- The one-year limitation period under the first proviso to Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. is clear, unambiguous, and cannot be extended by the court's enforcement powers or the defaulting party's acquiescence. (!)
- Dismissal of a prior recovery application bars recovery of those specific arrears, and no further steps against such dismissal extend the limitation for older arrears. (!)
- Pendency or dismissal of a revision against the original maintenance order does not extend the one-year limitation for recovery applications. (!)
- In recovery applications, only arrears for the 12 months immediately preceding the application date are recoverable at the awarded maintenance rate. (!)
- Prior payments or deposits by the maintenance obligor toward arrears must be accounted for, potentially satisfying recoverable amounts. (!)
- Issuance of a non-bailable warrant for recovery is not justified where recoverable arrears are limited or already satisfied by payments. (!)
- An impugned recovery order exceeding the one-year limitation is liable to be quashed on revision. (!)
Back
