SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 491

I.P.RAO
Vijay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S.L. Kochar for applicant; Ramesh Kumar, Deputy Advocate General for State.

JUDGMENT

The applicant was tried along with 8 others on the allegation that they have assaulted Hamansingh (PW 1) on 16.1.1977 at about 5 p.m. and caused fracture of PW 1's nasal bone. The other persons who were tried along with the applicant have been acquitted and the applicant alone was convicted under section 325 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for four months. On appeal, the learned appellate Judge has confirmed the findings and sentence. Aggrieved by the said confirmation, the applicant has preferred this revision.

The Courts below have acted upon the evidence of P.W. 1, the injured and P.W. 4 the Head Constable who intervened at the time of the incident and convicted the accused. The only discrepancy found in Ute evidence of PW 1 is that at one place he stated that he was attacked with Katarna and at another stage he stated that he was attacked with the lathi having iron head. It is not the sharp edge of the weapon that hit the complainant, but it is only the wood an portion that had hit the nose of the complainant and caused fracture.

PW 7 the doctor and PW 10 Radiologist have proved the grievous nature of the injury caused to PW 1. The conviction of the applicant unde


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top