Back
T.S. Doabia, J.
Rajaram v. Rajaram
C.R. No. 793 of 1994 (G); Decided on 29.3.1995*.
flfoy Áfdz;k lafgrk] 1908 & vk- 6 fu- 17 & i‘pkr~orhZ ?kVuk & vfHkopu esa la‘kks/ku }kjk vfHkys[k ij ykbZ tk ldrh gSA
Initially the suit was filed for injunction. Later on an application seeking amendment was made under order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. It was pleaded by the plaintiffs that during the pendency of the litigation, some constructions have been raised. By way of amendment, mandatory injunction was sought. This prayer was denied. Against this order, the present revision has been filed.
It may be seen that if something has happened during the pendency of the litigation that can certainly be permitted to be brought on record by way of amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. Such a course was approved by the High Court of Punjab in Puran Chand Sant Lal v. Nitya Nanda, AIR 1958 Punjab 460. Justice, A.N. Grover (later, Judge of the Supreme Court) observed as under:--
"In a suit for a prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant for making constructions on a joint site, a decree for a mandatory injunction cannot be granted without amendment of the plaint. Such amendment can be allowed even at the stage of second appeal."
In this view of the matter, the petitioners are allowed to amend the plaint. It would, however, be open to the defendants to urge that the plea sought to be enforced is barred by limitation.
Petition is disposed of.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
