This appeal is against the order dated 14.2.1996 passed by the lower appellate Court in Civil Appeal No. 27-A/94 setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and remanded the matter to the trial Court for fresh decision after framing three additional issues.

Briefly stated the facts are that the plaintiff-appellant Dheeraj Singh filed a suit for declaration against the respondents. The suit has been decreed. Respondent No. 1 Madhav Singh preferred an appeal before the lower appellate Court. The lower appellate Court heard the matter and considered that three additional issues are necessary for adjudication of the matter. These three issues are reproduced below :

¼1½ D;k fodYi esa Áfroknh dk yxkrkj 12 o”kZ ;k mlls Hkh vf/kd le; ls oknh ds LoRoksa ls bUdkj djrs gq, ,dek= fojks/kh Lo:i dk vkf/kiR; pyk vk jgk gS] bl dkj.k oknh ds LoR; lekIr gks dj Áfroknh Hkwfe Lokeh gks pqdk gS\

¼2½ D;k oknh dk okn vof/k ckâ gS\

¼3½ D;k okn Hkwfe ij oknh dk vkf/kiR; ugha gS vkSj bl dkj.k dsoy LoRo ?kks”k.kk dk oknn Ápkyu ;ksX; ugha gS\

The lower appellate Court by the impugned order remanded the entire matter for fresh decision while setting aside the judgment and findings o