SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(MP) 503

J.G.CHITRE
Kishanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jai Singh for petitioners; Prakash Verma, Deputy Govt. Advocate for State.

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order which has been passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Narsinghgarh who dismissed the application of the petitioners filed on their behalf praying for exemption in respect of their attendance before the Court. The ground which was shown was that the petitioner had gone to SORAUJI for immersing the urns of the mother of the petitioner No. 1 Kishanlal. The learned Additional Sessions Judge pointed out in his order rejecting the said application that the said application was not mentioning the date of death of the mother of Kishanlal as well as it was not mentioning the place where the appellants had gone, He opined that the said application was vague and was not pointing out the justifiable cause for the absence of the petitioners.

Shri Jaisingh submitted that the learned Advocate who submitted the application would not have been knowing the exact details, and therefore, the petitioners should not be exposed to punishment on account of the mistake committed by him. Shri Prakash Verma, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate not be available for trial.

While dealing with such applications, the Co



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top