To appreciate the rival submissions raised at the Bar, I have carefully perused the impugned judgment. I have also scrutinised the evidence record with the assistance of the learned counsel for the parties. As far as the present appeal is concerned it is to be delved into whether the present accused/appellants have been rightly found guilty for the offence punishable under section 366 of IPC or not. The prosecutrix who has been examined as PW 1 has stated in her examination-in-chief that she accompanied Raghubir Singh, elder brother of her husband, as she was influenced by his statement that the land recorded in the name of her Late husband would be transferred to her. She has further stated that at Chhatarpur the registry could not be done on that day and was to be done on the next day. She has also stated that she was taken by the accused/appellants to Patha Dhakarwa where she stayed at Kishanlal's house where she was left behind by the accused/appellants on the pretext that they had got into some sort of trouble. When she made enquiries from Kishanlal and Sitaram, she came to learn that she had been sold by the accused/appellants for Rs. 4,000/-. It is in her evidence t