SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(MP) 430

S.B.SAKRIKAR
Udhavdas Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Srimurti Radhakrishna Mandir, Dehrighat – Respondent


Advocates:
V.M. Rege for applicant; Smt. Dimple Agarwal for non-applicant.

JUDGMENT

Applicant-defendant has directed this revision against order dated 18.3.1999 passed by 1st Civil Judge, Class II, Shujalpur, in C.S. No. 117-A/98, thereby on application of the non-applicant No.1 (plaintiff), the trial Court rejected the counter claim filed on behalf of the applicant along-with his written statement and held that the alleged claim with written statement shall be accepted only as written statement filed under provisions of O. 8, CPC.


Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that:


Originally, a suit on behalf of the Srimurti Radhakrishana Mandir was filed by one pujari Maniramdas as manager of the said temple for declaration and injunction with regard to the disputed land entered in the name of temple in revenue papers against respondents No. 2 to 4. During the pendency of the said suit, Maniramdas expired and in his place, name of Mahant Narharidas was substituted as manager of the temple. Later on, an application was filed on behalf of the applicant for imp-leading him as plaintiff in place of deceased Maniramdas on the ground that he is the chellan of deceased Maniramdas and succeeds to the office of the manager of the temple. The application was di




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top