SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 681

N.K.MODY
R. K. Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Anjuman – Respondent


Advocates:
M.I. Khan for appellant; S.R. Bohra, Dy. Government Advocate for respondents.

JUDGMENT

Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 9.9.2004 passed by II ADJ, Indore in Regular Civil Appeal No. 26/2004, whereby the judgment and decree dated 5.3.2004 for eviction of appellant was passed by 11th Civil Judge Class-I, Indore in Civil Suit No. 52-A/03 was confirmed, present appeal has been filed.

Short admitted facts of the case are that appellant is tenant in the suit accommodation @ Rs. 150/- per month of respondent No.1. Suit was tiled for eviction by the respondent No. 1 on the ground that tenancy of the appellant has been terminated under section 106 of Transfer of Property Act. Hence, appellant is entitled for vacation of the suit premises. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that ownership of the respondent No.1 is in dispute as the respondent No.1 has already filed the suit for declaration to the effect that it be declared that suit property is wakf Property. It is submitted that said suit was filed in the year 1969 and it is yet to be decided. Learned counsel further submits that in view of this when the rights of respondent No. 1 is sub-judiced decree of eviction cannot be passed against the appellant. It is further submitted that so f







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top