SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 1055

A.M.NAIK
Mona Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
Pan Bai Raikwar – Respondent


Advocates:
M.K. Sanghi for applicant; Brajesh Shrivastava for respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This revision application is submitted under section 23-E of M.P. Accommodation Control Act by the tenant revisionist against an order dated 3.7.2004 passed by the learned Rent Controlling Authority, Jabalpur.

2. Short facts leading to the case are that the landlady submitted an application under section 23 (A) (a) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act for eviction of the revisionist. She stated that the revisionist is a tenant @ Rs. 500/- per month under an oral tenancy. The landlady is a widow having lost her husband in the year 1995. It is further stated that the landlady is aged and finding it difficult to reside alone since last 2 1/2 years. Due to this the younger daughter of the landlady has started residing with her in order to take her care. Her this younger daughter is married and is residing with landlady alongwith her husband and two children. It is further stated that the landlady has only two rooms and one kitchen in her occupation and are insufficient for the residence. The revisionist admitted the tenancy but opposed the claim of bona fide need as pleaded by the respondent/landlady.


3. Learned counsel RCA vide his order dated 3.7.2004 found tha






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top