SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(MP) 834

SHEELA KHANNA
Udham @ Dinesh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
T.C. Bansal for applicant; B.D. Mahore, Public Prosecutor for State.

ORDER

1. With the consent of both the parties, matter is finally heard.

2. This criminal revision under section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short "the Act") is preferred against the order dated 22.6.2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha in Criminal Appeal No. 147/05, confirming the order dated 25.5.2005 passed by Juvenile Court, Vidisha in Criminal Case No. 7/05, whereby the application of the applicant for his bail was dismissed.

3. Briefly stated, the facts relevant for the purpose of this revision are as follows :-

On the report of the prosecutrix, Crime No.7/05 has been registered against the present applicant alongwith two others at P.S. Begamganj for committing offence under section 376 (2) (g) of IPC. The applicant has been arrested in this case on 4.2.2005. Since the applicant is a juvenile, therefore, after investigation his challan has been filed before the Juvenile Court. Vidisha. An application for bail of the applicant was moved before the Juvenile Court, but it was dismissed on the ground that his release would defeat the ends of justice. A second application for his bail was moved after filing of




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top