Back
S.C.VYAS
Jaipal Das – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Heard finally at motion hearing stage with the consent of both the parties.
2. This is a petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for giving a direction to trial Court to call public analyst in the Court so that he can be cross-examined by the petitioner-accused, who is facing trial under section 7 (I) read with section 16 (1) (a) (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 before CJM, Indore.
3. Short facts of the case are that on 14.8.2001 Food Inspector, took sample of mango pickle from the shop of present petitioner, after following the procedure prescribed in the Food Adulteration Act. One part of the sample was sent for analysis to the Public Analyst, Bhopal. Public Analyst in his report found that the sample is misbranded and on the basis of this report a private complaint was filed against the petitioner before learned CJM. At the stage of defence evidence present petitioner moved an application for calling Public Analyst for cross-examination under section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This application was rejected by learned CJM by order dated 16.3.2004. That order of reje
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
