SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 205

S.C.VYAS
Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Panama Chemical Works – Respondent


Advocates:
S.L. Jain for applicant; G.S. Chouhan, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. This revision is directed against the impugned order dated 2nd May, 2002, passed by I Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in Criminal Revision No. 426 of 2000, wherein and whereby set aside the order dated 25.9.2000 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore in Criminal Case No. 668 of 1999 and discharged the non-applicants of the charges under sections l20B, 407, 418 and 420 read with section 34 of the Penal Code.

2. The applicant Bank of Rajasthan through its Branch Manager Mr. B.M. Gupta had filed a complaint before the Court of JMFC, Indore against seven persons including the respondents No. 1 and 2 under sections 120B, 407, 418, 420 read with section 34 of the Penal Code on the allegations that accused No.1 Vijay Kumar Kothari is proprietor of accused No.2· concern. Accused No.3 is involved in a business of medicines at Kolkata and accused Nos. 4 and 5 are its directors. Accused No.6 is the Transport Company and accused No.7 is its proprietor.

3. The respondent No.1 had requested the applicant Bank to sanction· the credit loan facility of bill purchase to the extent of Rs. 1,20,27,820/-. The said facility was sanctioned by the Bank on 16.4.1996 to the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top