Back
SUBHASH SAMVATSAR
Laxman Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Heard on the question of admission.
This petition is filed by the petitioners who are plaintiffs under Article 27 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders Annexures P-l and P-2 dated 28.10.2004 and 13.12.2004 respectively passed by Civil Judge Class II Ashoknagar in Civil Suit No. 266A/90 whereby the Court below has closed the evidence of the plaintiffs.
2. Brief facts of the case is that the trial was fixed on 28.10.2004 for recording the evidence of the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have filed affidavit of one of the witnesses Laxman Singh but on that date the plaintiffs could not keep Laxman Singh present in Court for cross-examination. It is stated that Laxman Singh was ailing on that date and adjournment was sought on that ground. The Court granted adjournment to the plaintiffs petitioners for cross-examination of Laxman Singh on payment of costs of Rs. 100/and fixed the case for 13.12.2004. However, while adjourning the case for cross-examination of Laxman Singh, the Court has closed the right of examination of other witnesses on the ground that their affidavits are not filed by the plaintiffs.
3. After perusal of the provisions of Order 18 Rule
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
