RAKESH SAKSENA
Pramod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Applicants have filed this revision against the order dated 16.9.2006, passed by I Additional Sessions Judge, Khurai, in Sessions Trial No. 414/ 2005, framing the charge against the applicants u/s. 306/34 of IPC.
2. In short, the prosecution case is that on 18.7.2005, when Vijay Saraf (deceased) was in Court premises at Bina, applicants forcibly took him on a motorcycle, assaulted him and made him to sign some papers. Being harassed and frustrated, on 19.7.2005, Vijay consumed poison (Sulphas) and committed suicide. According to postmortem examination report, death was caused by cardio-respiratory failure, as a result of suspected poisoning. On receiving the report about his death, police registered a murg and enquired into the matter. On enquiry, it was found that after doing his MBA, deceased entered into partnership with Manish Shrivastava and obtained dealership of Indo-Parma Tractor. Both of them borrowed huge amount of money, but subsequently they incurred losses. According to prosecution, Manish Shrivastava was liable to make good all the losses, but he did not do so. It is said that the applicants had also advanced money to them, but when deceased did not rep
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.