SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 434

H.M.GUPTA
Manohar Dass – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Sharma for applicant; M. Bharadwaj, Government Advocate for State; T.C. Bansal for respondents No.2 and 3.

ORDER

1. The instant revision is for impugning the judgment dated 21.3.2001 passed by Sessions Judge, Guna in Criminal Appeal No. 8/01, whereby the learned Judge has affirmed the conviction of the respondents No.2 and 3 for the offence punishable under sections 326/149, 325/149 and 323/149 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aron Camp Guna, in Criminal Case No. 398/99 vide judgment dated 27.12.2000. Vide the aforesaid judgment dated 27.12.2000, the learned Magistrate had imposed rigorous imprisonment for 2 years for the offence punishable under section 326/149 of IPC, rigorous imprisonment for 1 year for the offence punishable under section 325/149 of IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 6 months under section 323/149 with fine of Rs. 2,000/-, 1,000/- and 500/respectively to each of the respondents No.2 and 3. While modifying the sentence vide impugned judgment, the learned Judge imposed the jail sentence to the extent already undergone by the respondents No.2 and 3 i.e. for a period of 11 days and extended the fine sentence of Rs. 500/- in total and in place of total amount of fine of Rs. 3,500/-; Rs. 4,000/- has been imposed on each of the respondents No.2 and 3.

2. Sh










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top