SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(MP) 1112

AJIT SINGH
Munnalal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Surendra Singh for appellant; G.P. Singh, Deputy Government Advocate for State.

JUDGMENT

1. Appellant, Munnalal, has been convicted under section 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentenced to one-year simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- or, in default of payment of fine, three months simple imprisonment by the impugned judgment dated 3.10.1991 passed in Special Criminal Case No. 20/1986 by the Special Judge, Jabalpur.

2. According to the prosecution case, M/s. Nemchand Munnalal had a licence to sell kerosene oil as semi wholesale dealer at Panagar, District Jabalpur. On 24.8.1986 at about 11:30 a.m. Food Inspector S.K. Jain (PW 1) inspected the business premises of M/s. Nemchand Munnalal in the presence of appellant. During inspection it was found that stock register was maintained till 23.8.1986 and the opening balance of the stock of kerosene oil on that date was shown as 2400 liters. Since 200 liters of kerosene oil was sold on 23.8.1986, the opening balance of the stock for 24.8.1986 ought to have been 2200 liters, but on physical verification the stock of kerosene oil was found only 1340 liters. Thus, there was a short fall of 860 liters of kerosene oil, which was unlawfully disposed of. It was also found that actual stock and selling pric














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top