SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(MP) 749

A.P.SHRIVASTAVA
Gudda – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sunil Soni, B.S. Dhakad for appellants; D.R. Sihare, Public Prosecutor for State.

JUDGMENT

1. Both these appeals arise out of a common judgment and hence shall be disposed of by the same judgment. Appellants have been convicted and sentenced by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge Guna (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No. 272/98, dated 11th February, 2000 by which appellant No.1 Gudda has been convicted under section 307 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. Appellant No.2 Raghunath has been convicted under section 307 read with section 34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation. Appellant No.2 Raghunath has further been convicted under section 323 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months Criminal Appeal No. 406/2000 has also filed by the appellant No.1, Gudda from Jail.

2. During the course of arguments, it is submitted by the counsel that Criminal Appeal No. 262/2000 was filed on behalf of both the appellants but subsequently, appellant No.1 Gudda also filed a separate appeal from Jail which is Criminal Appeal No. 40612000. The subsequent jail appeal No. 406/2000 is, therefore, filed because in Criminal Ap











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top