A.P.SHRIVASTAVA
Gudda – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Both these appeals arise out of a common judgment and hence shall be disposed of by the same judgment. Appellants have been convicted and sentenced by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge Guna (M.P.) in Sessions Trial No. 272/98, dated 11th February, 2000 by which appellant No.1 Gudda has been convicted under section 307 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. Appellant No.2 Raghunath has been convicted under section 307 read with section 34 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation. Appellant No.2 Raghunath has further been convicted under section 323 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months Criminal Appeal No. 406/2000 has also filed by the appellant No.1, Gudda from Jail.
2. During the course of arguments, it is submitted by the counsel that Criminal Appeal No. 262/2000 was filed on behalf of both the appellants but subsequently, appellant No.1 Gudda also filed a separate appeal from Jail which is Criminal Appeal No. 40612000. The subsequent jail appeal No. 406/2000 is, therefore, filed because in Criminal Ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.