Ajay Kumar Singh vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2008 Supreme(MP) 27

A.M.NAIK
Ajay Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Gaurav Samadhiya for petitioner; V.S. Chaturvedi, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Petitioner was Asstt. Director, Fisheries at the relevant time at Ratlam. He was asked to attend training on Govt. expenses at Central Fisheries Education Institution, Mumbai for the training session 1997-99. Pursuant thereto, petitioner was relieved on 16.7.1997 from the office of the Asstt. Director Fisheries Ratlam for joining at Mumbai for the purposes of training. He reported at the training institution Mumbai on 17.7.1997. At the training institution, petitioner was required to deposit Rs. 3,065/- in addition to Rs. 1,450/- as hostel fees. These expenses were liable to be deposited by the Govt. which were not duly deposited. Since the petitioner was not possessed of sufficient money, he could not deposit the amount. Consequently, he was not allowed to attend the training. He came back to Ratlam and reported the matter to respondent No.2 immediately on 18.7.1997. Petitioner was, thereafter, suspended and was served with a show-cause notice marked as Annexure A-10. He submitted his reply as revealed in Annexure A-11, refuting the allegations and further explained the reasons for not attending the training. After receipt of the reply of the petitioner, the Director of Fi