A.P.SHRIVASTAVA
Sovaran Singh and others – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This revision is filed by the applicants under sections 397 read with section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, arising out of the order dated 17.11.2006, passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Morena (M.P.) in Criminal Revision No. 40 of 2006, by which the Revisional Court directed the learned trial Court to decide the application of the prosecution under section 216 of Cr.PC, dated 22.8.2005.
2. The main grievances of the applicants are that the impugned order passed by Court below is illegal and not sustainable in law because the same was filed against an interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court below was not having jurisdiction to interfere with the order passed by learned trial Court in exercising its revisional jurisdiction.
3. Fact of the case, in brief, is that on the basis of the report lodged by the applicant No.2 at the Police Station Joura bearing Crime No. 355/97, under sections 302, 147, 148, 149 of IPC was registered. Subsequently, the matter was investigated by the CID. On the basis of CID report, the offence under sections 304-A, 201, 177, 182, 211 of IPC was registered against the applicants. The trial Court framed the charges under se
1. Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra reported in = [AIR 1978 SC 47]
2. V.C. Shukla v. State through C.B.I. reported in = [AIR 1980 SC 962]
3. Habib v. State of M.P. and others reported in = [2000 (2) JLJ 72
4. Khagesh Kumar Goel v. State of M.P. and others reported in = [1997 (2) JLJ 276
6. Amar Nath and others v. State of Haryana and others = [1977 (II) MPWN 434
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.