SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 148

SANJAY YADAV
Rajbahadur Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rajkamal Chaturvedi for petitioner; Samdarshi Tiwari, Government Advocate for respondents.

ORDER

1. Validity of orders passed on 17.9.2007, 27.5.2008 and 3.9.2008 are called in question in present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. By order passed on 17.9.2007, the gun licence of the petitioner was revoked, whereas by order passed on 27.5.2008, appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed and by order dated 3.9.2008 Second Appeal preferred by petitioner was dismissed being not maintainable.

2. The petitioner was the holder of arms licence No. MPC HP/STE/ 3.1.2003 granted to him under the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. While he was holding the licence, a report was furnished by the Superintendent of Police, Chhatarpur on 8.12.2004 to District Magistrate Chhatarpur/ Licensing Authority, recommending therein the revocation of gun licence because of the involvement of petitioner in number of criminal cases, viz., Crime No. 71/82 under section 302 IPC, Crime No. 83/02 under section 25/27, Arms Act, Crime No. 64/87, sections 302,404,147,148, 159, 130-B, IPC, read with section 25/27, Arms Act, Crime No. 186/3 under sections 147, 149, 294, 506, 336 IPC, Crime No. 48/04 under sections 294, 323, 506-B, 336, 34, IPC, Ishtgash No. 73/07 sections 1












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top