SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 895

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Shobha Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Neeraj Ashar for appellants; Rakesh Sharma for respondents.

ORDER

1. The appellants/objectors have directed this appeal under Section 100 of CPC being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 14.08.2007 passed by District Judge, Betul in Civil Regular Appeal No.9-N2007 affirming the order dated 6.3.2007 and 20.2.2007 passed by Additional Civil Judge Class-1 Betul in Execution Case No. 175-A/00 (T.D. No.23/06) dismissing their separate applications filed under Order 21 Rule 97 of CPC.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal in short are that the respondents No.1 and 2 herein filed a Civil Original Suit No.20-A/99 against the respondents No.3 to 5 for eviction with respect of some premises, the same was decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 29.6.2002, on challenging the same by the respondents No.3 to 6 in their two separate Civil Regular Appeals No.3-A/03 and 15-A/03 the same were dismissed, thereafter respondents No.3 to 6 filed S.A.No.456/03, on consideration the same was also dismissed by this Court vide order dated 11.1.2005 Accordingly, aforesaid decree passed by the trial Court had been affirmed against the respondents No.3 to 6. Subsequently on filing the execution proceedings by the respondents No.1 and 2 agai











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top