SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 766

R.K.GUPTA
Hanumant Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
M. P. State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
Sunil Jain for appellant; Vivek Khedkar, Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 State; M.P.S. Raghuvanshi for respondent No.4.

ORDER

1. They are heard.

2. The present petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the part of order dated 4.1.2007, Annexure P/l. By this order, the respondents have given promotion to the petitioner as Ticket Examiner with effect from 26.2.1983. It is also directed by the respondents that the petitioner will be given notional promotion on the aforesaid post from 26.2.1993. It is also stated in the order that after promotion of the petitioner with effect from 26.2.1993 as Ticket Examiner, the petitioner shall not claim any future promotion on that basis. This part of the order is being challenged by the petitioner.

3. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the aforesaid order of promotion was passed on the basis of a judgment passed by this Court in W.P. No. 858/93 decided by this Court on 31'st October, 1994. It is to be seen that once a proforma promotion has been given to the petitioner as Ticket Examiner from 26.2.1993 then the petitioner shall certainly be entitled to claim the seniority and other consequential benefits excluding the monetary benefits from the date the notional benefit is given on promotion as Ticket Examiner with effect from 26.2.1


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top