SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 408

J.K.MAHESHWARI
Abhay @ Guddu – Appellant
Versus
Bhavana – Respondent


Advocates:
Applicant in person; Manish Yadav for non-applicant.

ORDER

1. Seeking quashment of the private complaint bearing No.1255/2006 filed by the non-applicant Smt. Bhawana this petition has been filed under section 482 of the CrPC by the applicant. It is contended by the applicant present in person that the cause of action is of the year 4.3.2005 of Guramkhedy Semri-Harchandra, Sohagpur District Hoshangabad. However Judicial Magistrate First Class, Indore is having no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint, and to take cognizance. It is further his contention that averments made in the private complaint are fictitious, vexatious and oppressive, looking to the fact that after deliver a child the non-applicant has not come back to her in laws home however petitioner has submitted an application in Paramarsh Kendra, Pipariya. Thereafter the allegation of demand of dowry has been alleged against him in such circumstances the present petition may be dismissed. At last it is his contention that on the basis of averments made in the private complaint on the face of it the ingredient of section 498A of the IPC has not been made out, therefore, the complaint may be dismissed.

2. Learned counsel Shri Manish Yadav appearing of behalf of the non-applic




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top