SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 590

Subhash Kakade
Mohd. Safi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Pramendra Sen for appellants; R.S. Shukla, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal under section 374(2) of CrPC against judgment dated 6.1.98 in Sessions Trial No. 358/97 passed by the learned VIII th Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur by which the appellants Mohd. Safi and Siraj Ahmed have been convicted under section 436/34 of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for five years and to a fine of Rs.1,000/- each.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on dated 26.4 .1997 in the night at about 9:30 PM, complainant Saida Sultana was sitting with her tenant Sahida Bano at the upper side of her house. At that time appellant Mohd. Safi and Siraj Ahmad came over there and started abusing her. Complainant came to down floor where appellant Siraj Ahmad caught hold her hands and appellant Mohd. Safi set her homely objects bed etc. on fire by pouring kerosene oil. They also tried to pour kerosene oil on the person of complainant Saida Sultana and attempt to set her ablaze. When she hue and cry, the appellants ran away.

3. Return report of above facts presented at Hanumantal Police Station, Jabalpur, on the basis of which, the First Information Report was registered. Investigating Officer prepared the spot map, memo of loss, seized some burnt and un-bu





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top