SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(MP) 550

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK RUSIA, PRADEEP MITTAL, JJ.
M/s Jai Prakash Associated Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others - Respondents
Misc. Petition No. 6936 of 2019
Decided On : 19-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri R.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anjali Upadhyay.
For the Respondents:Shri Ritwik Parashar, Government Advocate.

Stamp duty is determined by the law prevailing on the date of execution. For mining leases, duty is calculated on the average annual rent reserved, not the total rent for the lease period, and royalty and dead rent cannot be aggregated as they are mutually exclusive.

Headnote:(A) Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 26 and 40 - Registration Act, 1908 - Section 23 - Stamp duty on mining lease - Determination of duty - It is clear from the relevant law and rules that stamp duty is to be determined with reference to the date of execution of the document, and not on the date when the document is impounded or when an order is subsequently passed by the Registrar of Stamps (Para 18) - Calculation of duty under state amendment for leases of thirty years or more - Stamp duty is payable at five percent (5%) of the average annual rent reserved, not on the total rent multiplied by the lease period (Para 26) - Royalty and dead rent are mutually exclusive and the lessee is required to pay either the royalty or the dead rent, whichever is higher; therefore, both cannot be levied simultaneously or aggregated for calculating stamp duty (Paras 22, 24) - Penalty under Section 40 - When the primary calculation of the deficit stamp duty is erroneous, the imposition of a penalty is also unsustainable (Para 26).

(B) Prospective and Retrospective Operation - A substantive amendment intended to change the law applies prospectively - An amendment introducing a lower rate of stamp duty cannot be applied retrospectively to a lease deed executed prior to the date the amendment came into force (Paras 19, 21).

(C) Applicability of Cess - Cess leviable on leases that exceed thirty years cannot be lawfully imposed on a lease deed for a period of exactly thirty years (Para 25).

Facts of the case:
A petitioner was granted a mining lease for thirty years. The lease was executed on a nominal stamp paper and subsequently presented for registration. The revenue authority determined a deficit in stamp duty by calculating 5% of the sum of average annual royalty and dead rent, multiplied by thirty years, and further added a cess and a significant penalty. This determination was upheld by the appellate revenue authority.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the revenue authority committed multiple errors: first, by calculating duty on the total rent for the entire lease period instead of the average annual rent; second, by aggregating royalty and dead rent; third, by incorrectly applying a cess to a lease that did not exceed thirty years; and fourth, by applying a retrospective view to a later amendment. Consequently, the calculated deficit and the resulting penalty were erroneous.

Issues: The main issues were whether stamp duty is determined by the date of execution or registration, whether royalty and dead rent can be aggregated for duty calculation, and whether the applicable duty rate applies to the average annual rent or the total aggregate rent for the duration of the lease.

Ratio Decidendi: Stamp duty is governed by the law in force on the date of execution of the instrument. For mining leases, duty is calculated on the average annual rent reserved, and because royalty and dead rent are alternatives (whichever is higher), they cannot be combined to inflate the taxable value.

Result: Petition allowed.

ORDER :

Pradeep Mittal, J.

The petitioner has filed the present Miscellaneous Petition challenging the order dated 29.03.2016 (Annexure P/3) passed by the Collector, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay deficit stamp duty along with a penalty amounting to Rs.2,44,57,462/- (Rs.1,94,58,462/- towards deficit stamp duty and Rs.50,00,000/- as penalty). Against the said order, the petitioner preferred a revision before the Board of Revenue, however, the same was dismissed vide order dated 28.01.2019.

2. The facts of the case are that petitioner Company was granted a mining lease for extraction of limestone over an area of 150.028 hectares situated at Village Karmau, Tehsil Rampur Baghlan, District Rewa (Madhya Pradesh), for a period of 30 years by the State Government of Madhya Pradesh for use in its cement manufacturing plant. A Mining Lease Agreement was executed on 09.10.2014. The petitioner required limestone as captive mining material for manufacturing cement and, due to urgent necessity, executed the agreement on a stamp paper of Rs. 1,000/-. The petitioner submitted the document before the Sub-Registrar, Rampur Baghelan, on 12.12.2014 for proper determination and payment of stamp duty and for registration. In compliance with Circular No. 1164 dated 21.05.2004 issued by the Inspector General, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, the Sub-Registrar, Rampur Baghelan, forwarded the document to the Registrar for correction and determination of stamp duty under Section 38(vi) of the Stamp Act, as amended by the Madhya Pradesh Stamp Duty Amendment Ordinance, 2014 , published in the M.P. Gazette dated 16.09.2014 and effective from 16.09.2014. As per Article 38(vi), where a lease purports to be for a period of thirty years or more, or in perpetuity, or does not specify a definite period, stamp duty is payable at five percent (5%) of the amount of premium or money advanced or to be advanced as set forth in the deed, plus the average annual rent reserved, or the market value of the property, whichever is higher. As per the aforesaid provision, stamp duty was payable at 5% of the average annual rent reserved.

3. On 19.01.2015, proceedings were registered by the Collector of Stamps, Satna, under Section 40 read with Article 38(vi) of the Stamp Act. The Collector issued a letter dated 15.01.2015 to the Mining Officer, Satna, seeking information regarding the average annual royalty for the lease area of 150.028 hectares. The Mining Officer, Satna, submitted a report dated 24.01.2015 stating that the average annual royalty, as per the approved mining plan, was Rs. 1,25,35,110/-. The Mining Officer also stated that the dead rent at Rs. 1,000/- per hectare per year for five years would amount to Rs. 6,04,000/-. However, it is settled that dead rent cannot be added to royalty, as royalty becomes payable when it exceeds the dead rent, and in such cases, dead rent is not payable separately. Based on the Mining Officer’s report, the stamp duty at 5% of the average annual royalty of Rs. 1,25,35,110/- would amount to Rs. 6,26,755/-. However, the Collector wrongly added the dead rent and further multiplied the total annual amount by 30 years, determining the duty at 5% on Rs. 12,65,59,10/- × 30 years, and thereby calculated stamp duty at Rs. 1,94,58,462/-which also included dead rent and cess (Upkar). The said calculation is wholly erroneous. Under Article 38(vi), stamp duty is to be calculated on the average annual rent reserved. Royalty is equivalent to rent as per Section 26 of the Stamp Act, and dead rent cannot be added thereto. Therefore, stamp duty payable should be 5% of Rs. 1,25,35,110/-, i.e., Rs. 6,26,755/- only. The determination of duty on the entire 30-year lease period is illegal and contrary to law. The petitioner filed objections before the Collector of Stamps on 11.04.2016 stating that, as per the mining plan, total production for five years would be 5,96,910 metric tons, and the average annual production would be 1,19,382 metric tons. At t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top