SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(MP) 580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL DHAGAT, J.
Rajesh Kumar Gupta - Petitioner
Versus
Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 17387 of 2025
Decided On : 18-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Satyam Agrawal.
For the Respondent: Shri Aditya Khandekar.

Leave encashment cannot be granted during pendency of judicial or departmental proceedings that may result in dismissal or removal, as the right to such benefit ceases upon termination and no provision exists for provisional leave encashment under the applicable service rules.

Headnote:(A) M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 - Rule 64; M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 - Rule 8, Rule 25, Rule 36 - Withholding of leave encashment - Earned leave is not a government due but is salary for the period of leave to which a government servant is entitled; therefore, it does not fall within the definition of ascertainable government dues under Rule 64(1)(c) of the Pension Rules (Para 8).

(B) M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 - Rule 8 - Effect of dismissal, removal or resignation - The claim to leave to the credit of a government servant ceases from the date of dismissal, removal, or resignation (Para 9). In cases where departmental enquiry or judicial proceedings are pending which may result in the termination, dismissal, or removal of the government servant, the right to leave encashment is affected and can only be claimed once the proceedings attain finality (Para 10, 11).

(C) Provisional benefits - While Rule 64 of the Pension Rules provides for provisional pension and gratuity during pendency of proceedings, there is no enabling provision under the Leave Rules for provisional leave encashment; thus, an employee must wait for the final outcome of the proceedings (Para 12).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an order rejecting the encashment of earned leave on the ground that a revision against conviction and sentence in a criminal case was pending before the High Court. The respondent had rejected the prayer citing Rule 64(1)(c) of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, maintaining that payment is to be made only upon the conclusion of proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court found that although leave encashment is not a government due, the right to such benefit ceases if a government servant is dismissed or removed from service. Given that the pending judicial proceedings could lead to the removal of the petitioner from service, the claim for leave encashment can only be considered if the petitioner is finally acquitted.

Issues: Whether the government is entitled to withhold leave encashment if departmental or judicial proceedings against an employee are pending, in light of the M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 and M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977.

Ratio Decidendi: The right to leave encashment ceases upon dismissal or removal from service under Rule 8 of the Leave Rules. Because pending judicial or departmental proceedings may result in termination, and there is no legal provision for "provisional" leave encashment, such benefits cannot be granted until the proceedings reach a final conclusion.

Result: Writ Petition is dismissed.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • administrative law
    • government employees
      • leave encashment (Para 1, 2, 8, 11, 12)
      • pension rules
        • rule 64 (Para 7, 8)
        • rule 60 (Para 8)
      • termination and removal
        • rule 8 of leave rules (Para 9, 10, 11)
  • practice and procedure
    • writ jurisdiction
      • article 226 (Para 1)

Table of Contents

1. Challenge to order rejecting leave encashment during pending criminal proceedings under Pension Rules. (Para 1 )

2. Petitioner argued no provision for withholding leave encashment; respondent cited Rule 64(1)(c) of Pension Rules. (Para 2 , 3 )

3. Writ Petition dismissed; leave encashment cannot be granted during pendency of criminal proceedings. (Para 13 )

4. Can leave encashment be withheld during pendency of judicial proceedings under Rule 64 of the Pension Rules?

No. Rule 64 only provides for provisional pension and gratuity, not leave encashment. Leave encashment is not a government due. (Para 7 , 8 )

5. What is the effect of dismissal, removal, or resignation on a government servant's right to leave encashment?

Rule 8 of the Leave Rules states that the claim to leave on credit ceases from the date of dismissal, removal, or resignation. (Para 9 )

6. Can provisional leave encashment be granted during pending departmental or judicial proceedings?

No. There is no enabling provision for provisional leave encashment. The employee must wait for the final outcome. (Para 12 )

ORDER :

Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging order dated 28/02/2025 contained in Annexure P-7. By said order prayer of petitioner for encashment of earned leave was rejected on ground that revision filed by petitioner against conviction and sentence is pending before High Court. Prayer for encashment of earned leave was rejected in aid with Rule 64 (1)(c) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 on grounds that payment is to be made on conclusion of proceedings. Final retiral benefits are to be paid after adjustment of provisional pension gratuity paid under Rule 64 (1)(c) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 on conclusion of proceedings. Proceedings include departmental enquiry or judicial proceedings.

2. Counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that respondents had committed an error in passing impugned order and same is not in consonance with law. There is no specific provision which aids withholding of leave encashment of petitioner. In Writ Appeal No.772/2019 (Sevaram Khandegar Vs. State of M.P. & Others) Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 04/02/2019 held that there is no provision, which disentitles petitioner during pendency of criminal case from encashing leave in his account. Writ Appeal filed was allowed and respondents were directed to release 50% of gratuity as directed by learned Single Judge as well as amount which is in account of petitioner under leave encashment head. In support of his contention counsel also placed reliance on orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.18341/2023 (Badelal Pathak Vs. State of M.P. & Others) decided on 05/09/2023 and also order dated 10/02/2023 passed in Writ Petition No.17844/2020 (Bhuvansingh Waskel Vs. State of M.P. & Others). In view of aforesaid, counsel for petitioner prays for quashing of impugned order and allowing Writ Petition.

3. Counsel appearing for respondents submitted that leave encashment was rejected placing reliance on Rule 64 (1)(c) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976, which authorises withholding of pensionary benefit during pendency of judicial proceedings. There is no illegality in the order. If petitioner is finally acquitted, shall be adjusted against final retiral benefits. In view of same, Writ Petition be dismissed.

4. Heard counsel for the parties.

5. Question before this Court is whether State Government is at liberty to withhold leave encashment if departmental proceeding or judicial proceeding against an employee is pending in aid of Section 64(1)(c) of Civil Services Pension Rules, 1976.

6. A Government servant under Rule 25(1)(a) of M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 shall be entitled to 30 days earned leave in every calendar year. Every Government servant has a leave account, which is prepared in accordance with Rule 14 of aforesaid Rules. Leave of every Government servant is credited into leave account in two installments of 15 days each on first January and first July every year. As per Rule 25(1)(c) of M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 maximum earned leave credited into account shall not exceed limit of 300 days. Maximum earned leave which can be granted to Government servant under Rule 25(2) of M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 is 120 days. As per Rule 36 of M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 Government servant who proceeds on earned leave is entitled to leave salary equivalent to the pay drawn immediately before proceeding on earned leave. Rule 36 of M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 further lays down that on retirement or resignation of a Government servant, it is to be seen whether he has availed more leave then permissible to him and in such cases adjustment shall be made in respect of leave salary if leave is overdrawn. As per Rule 8 of M.P. Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1977 any claim to leave to credit of a Government servant, who is dismissed or removed or resigned from Government service, ceases from the date of such d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top