JUDGMENT

Both the interim prayers are taken up for hearing and disposal. Heard learned counsel, Mr. Somik Deb for the petitioner-applicant and learned Asstt. Solicitor General, Mr. P.K. Biswas, assisted by learned counsel Mr. A. Roy, for the respondent-O.Ps.

2. The petitioner filed the connected writ petition inter alia praying for setting aside/quashing the disagreement note dated 21.11.2012 (Annexure P/6 to the writ petition) and order of punishment dated 20.11.2013 (Annexure P/8 to the writ petition), passed by one Vivek Vaid, DIG (CR & VIG), whereunder the report submitted by the complaint committee has not been agreed by the DIG as a disciplinary authority and proposed for taking action against the petitioner and consequently passed the order of punishment.

3. Fact, in short, for the purpose of resolving these special petitions, is that the petitioner was working as Commandant of CRPF Battalion, posted at Lalgarh, West Bengal at the relevant point of time and Smt. Tulsi Dungriyal was working as Assistant Commandant under the petitioner. It has been alleged by Smt. Tulsi Dungriyal that the petitioner while working as her superior authority sexually harassed her in th