1. Heard Ms. S. Deb Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the wife, the petitioner in Criminal Revision Petition No. 8 of 2015 and respondent No. 1 in Criminal Revision Petition No. 27 of 2015 as well as Mr. S.C. Das, learned counsel appearing for the husband, the respondent in Criminal Revision Petition No. 8 of 2015 and the respondent No. 1 in Criminal Revision Petition No. 27 of 2015. Also heard Mr. R.C. Debnath, learned Addl. PP appearing for the State.

2. As these criminal revision petitions being Criminal Revision Petition No. 8 of 2015 filed by Smt. Paptu Sharma, the former wife and Criminal Revision Petition No. 27 of 2015 filed by the former husband are directed against the judgment and order dated 02.12.2014 delivered in Misc. 51 of 2014 by the Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura, these are clustered for disposal by a common judgment.

3. The former wife by filing the revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Cr. P.C. has contended that the maintenance allowance as provided by the Family Court at Rs. 2,000/- for herself and Rs. 2,000/- for her daughter is so meagre that their destitution is inevitable. According to Ms. Deb Gupta, learned counsel that the fo