DEEPAK GUPTA
Ranjit Das – Appellant
Versus
Sajib Paul – Respondent
This appeal by the claimants is directed against the award dated 16.12.2010 whereby, the learned Tribunal rejected the claim of the petition on the ground that the claimants being the brothers of the deceased were not entitled to any compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the claimants who are the major brothers of the deceased filed a petition claiming compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. In the claim petition, it is mentioned that the deceased was travelling in Truck No.AS-25-C-7424 from Guwahati to Agartala as driver of the vehicle. In Para 16 itself it is again reiterated that the deceased himself was the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident. In Para 19, it is stated that all the claimants are brother of the deceased. Against Para 20, it is stated that the petitioners are entitled to get compensation under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. In the claim petition, it is also stated that when the truck being driven by deceased Raman Das reached at Kalabagan at about 3.00 p.m. at that time, the said vehicle fell into a ditch to save one pedestrian and therefore, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.