SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Tri) 266

S.TALAPATRA
Airports Authority of India, Agartala Airport, Singarbil – Appellant
Versus
Mina Rani Rudrapal, W/o Jyotindra Paul – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. PK Pal
For the Respondents: Mr. A De

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

Heard Mr. PK Pal, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. A De, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1&2. None appears for the respondent No.3 despite due notice from this Court.

2. By means of this appeal, filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, the judgment and award dated 07.08.2014 delivered in Misc. (LA) 117/2010 by the Land Acquisition Judge, Court No.4, West Tripura, Agartala has been challenged.

3. There is no dispute that by the Notification No. F.9(13)Rev/Acq/VI/98 dated 17.07.1998 under Section 4 of the LA Act and subsequent declaration of even number dated 11.08.1998 under Section 6 of the LA Act, the respondent No.3 had acquired the land of the respondent Nos. 1&2 measuring 0.03 acres of viti class of land under Mouja Singarbil, Khatian No.3392, plot No. 1670 for construction and extension of runway of Agartala Airport on the North side situated at Mouja Singarbil, under Sadar Sub-Division, West Tripura District.

4. After making inquiry under Section 11 of the LA Act, the LA Collector, the respondent No.3 herein, passed aw








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top