ARINDAM LODH
Kinsuk Datta, S/o Sri Binoytosh Datta – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary, Government of Tripura, Health and Family Welfare Department – Respondent
Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. M. Debbarma, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State-respondents.
2. Both the writ petitions are taken up together for final disposal by way of this common judgment.
3. By means of filing the present writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have raised their grievance to the notification dated 23.07.2014 wherein the respondents were pleased to regularize the period of absence in service under the Government of Tripura by way of granting extra-ordinary leave w.e.f. 08.10.2002 to 09.04.2012, but, with a rider that the said period will be treated as ‘break in service’. For convenience, the notification dated 23.07.2014 is reproduced here-in-below, in extenso :
GOVERNMENT OF TRIPURA
HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT
No. F.13(701)-HFW/90
Dated, the 23/07/2014
NOTIFICATION
The Governor of Tripura is pleased to grant Extra-ordinary Leave without pay with effect from 08.10.2002 to 09.04.2012 with break in service of Dr.(Mrs.) Anuradha Majumder, Gr.IV of THS, Belonia Sub Divisional Hospital, South Tripura.
Certified that Dr.(Mrs.) Anura
Jai Shankar vs. State of Rajasthan
Arunangsho Roy vs. State of Tripura
Shri B.D. Gupta vs. State of Haryana
Dayal Saran Sanan vs. Union of India and others
Canara Bank and others vs. Debasis Das and others
Shiv Shanker and another vs. Union of India and others
Gujarat Steel Tubes Limited vs. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.