AJAY RASTOGI, ARINDAM LODH
Dilip Kumar Datta, S/o Lt. Kamini Kumar Datta – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura (To be represented by the Secretary to the Government of Tripura), Department of Forest – Respondent
A. Lodh, J.
Since common questions of fact & law are involved in both the writ appeals, with consent of the parties, these are decided by the present order.
2. By means of these intra-court appeals, the appellants have challenged the legality of the judgment and order dated 28.07.2014, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) 242 of 2009 and WP(C) 164 of 2010 wherein and whereunder the learned Single Judge did not find any merit to interfere with the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority with affirmation by the Appellate Authority imposing penalty of reduction of pay scale to the lowest stage to Rs.4200/-, in the time scale of pay Rs.4200-120-6000-130-7300-150-8650/- in respect of writ appellant, Sri Dilip Kumar Datta; and Rs.3,200/-, in the time scale of pay Rs.3200-90-4280-100-5480-110-6030/- in respect of writ appellant, Sri Makhan Lal Dey with cumulative effect till the appellants could be found fit by the disciplinary authority to be allowed to earn increment from that stage.
3. A common disciplinary proceeding was initiated against the appellant Sri Dilip Kumar Datta, a Forester under the department of Forest and other two persons namely Makhan Lal Dey (appella
Ram Chander Vrs. Union of India & Ors.
Oriental Bank of Commerce & Anr. Vrs. R.K. Uppal
State of Madras Vrs. A. R. Srinivasan
State of West Bengal & Ors. Vrs. Sankar Ghosh
Ajit Kumar Nag Vrs. General Manager (PJ), Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Haldia & Ors.
State Bank of Bikaner and jaipur Vrs. Nemi Chand Nalwaya
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.