SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
S. Talapatra, J.
Sri Amar Suklabaidya - Appellant
Vs.
State of Tripura - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2017
Decided On : 28-11-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :S. Lodh, Advocate
For the Respondent: A. Roy Barman, Addl. PP.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of different sections of the IPC and POCSO Act in cases of sexual assault and harassment with sexual intent.

Headnote:

POCSO - Conviction under Section 354B of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012 - [IPC Section 354B, POCSO Act Section 8] - The court discussed the evidence and legal provisions related to sexual assault and intent, ultimately convicting the appellant under Section 11 of the POCSO Act instead.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted under Section 354B of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act for attempting to outrage the modesty of a child. The victim reported that the appellant tried to make her naked, leading to the filing of the case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence did not support the original charges but established harassment with sexual intent, leading to a conviction under Section 11 of the POCSO Act instead.

Issues: The issues revolved around the evidence of sexual assault and intent, as well as the applicability of different sections of the IPC and POCSO Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that while the original charges were not proven, the evidence supported a conviction under Section 11 of the POCSO Act for harassment with sexual intent.

Final Decision: The appellant's conviction under Section 354B of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act was set aside, and the appellant was convicted under Section 11 of the POCSO Act instead, with a reduced sentence.

JUDGMENT :

S. Talapatra, J.

Heard Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the state.

2. This is an appeal under section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973 from the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 24.03.2017 delivered in Special (POCSO) 32 of 2015 by the Special Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar.

3. By the said judgment, the appellant has been convicted under Section 354B of the IPC and section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, 'POCSO Act'). Pursuant thereto, the appellant has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3(three) years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 (rupees ten thousand) for commission of offence punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, with default imprisonment for 6(six) months. It has been directed that on realization of fine, the money should be paid to the victim as compensation and the said money be managed in a fixed deposit till she attained the majority. No separate sentence has been given for commission of offence punishable under Section 354B of the IPC.

4. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that from the complaint of the victim, PW.2 (the name is withheld for protection of her identity), it revealed that on 17.08.2015 when she went to visit her grandmother, she visited to a neighbouring quarters. Before she arrived in her grandmother's place, her grandmother left for the office. At that time, one boy who was working in the neighbouring quarters saw her and asked her to bring a piece of wood. Then, the said boy entered in her grandmother's quarters and tried to remove her pant from her wearing with evil motive. She punched on the chest of that boy and scolded him. Thereafter, the boy held her legs and told her not to say the incident to anyone. Then she rushed to the office of her grandmother, but her grandmother was also not available there. Then she informed a lady the entire incident and later on she informed the said incident to her grandmother. The victim came to know that the name of that boy was Amar Suklabaidya, the present appellant.

5. The victim submitted the complaint orally to the police and on the basis of the said complaint, Dharmanagar Women P.S. Case No.2015 WDN 013 dated 17.08.2015 was registered under Section 354B of the IPC and under Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The investigation was carried out by one, Rinki Debbarma, one Sub-Inspector of Police (PW.6).

6. On completion of the investigation, the final police report under section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973 was filed against the appellant for commission of the offence punishable under Section 354B of the IPC and under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The police papers were committed to the Special Court, which took cognizance and framed the charge under Section 354B of the IPC and under 'Section 7' of the POCSO Act, punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act against the appellant for intending to outrage the modesty of the victim (PW.2) and for acting with sexual intent to touch the body of the victim.

The appellant pleaded innocence and claimed to be tried in accordance with law.

7. To substantiate the charge, the prosecution adduced as many as 7(seven) witnesses including the victim and introduced 7(seven) documentary evidence including the oral ejahar (Exbt.1).

8. Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that the age of the victim has not been established by the prosecution with legal evidence and the evidentiary materials is inadequate for substantiating the charge under Section 354B of the IPC and under Section 8 of the POCSO Act. Mr. Lodh, learned counsel, having referred to the provision of Section 7 of the POCSO Act, has submitted that the appellant has not committed any sexual assault as defined under Section 7 of the POCSO Act. Section 7 of the POCSO Act reads as under:

"7. Sexual Assault.- Whoever, with sexual intent touches the vagina, penis, anu























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top