SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 63

S.G.CHATTOPADHYAY
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Abul Kashem, S/o. Sri Manjur Ali – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A. Gan Chowdhury, Adv., Mr. R.G. Chakraborty, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. D.C. Saha, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

[28000026000013]: With regard to determination of functional disability, this High Court in case of Samir Ch. Das Vs. Md. Jamal Hossain & Anr. in MAC App. No. 3 of 2019 has succinctly held that conversion of physical disability into functional disability is not a task of medical board. Such assessment should be made by the concerned Claims Tribunal. Observation of this Court in this regard is as under : "11. However, any such assessment of conversion of physical disability into functional disability is the task to be performed by the Claims Tribunal and not the medical expert. The deposition of the doctor before the Tribunal had to be confined to his assessment of the locomotive disability sustained by the claimant on account of the injury. He ought not to have been asked to assess the level of functional disability. …………………………………………."

[28000026000014]: In the given case, it is not denied that claimant is a day labourer by occupation. Almost a year after the accident he appeared before the District Disability Medical Board. Dr. Dipti Bikash Roy, PW-2 after his examination opined that he was having 40% locomotor disability. His statement that functional disability of the claimant extended to 30% is not acceptable in view of the decision of this Court in Samir Ch. Das(supra). Locomotor disability of a day labourer is likely to have a serious affect on his occupation. In all likelihood such disability would reduce his capacity to work as a day labourer. Therefore, under no circumstances his functional disability can be reduced to 30% in such case.


JUDGMENT :

This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by the insurance company against the award dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonamura in TS(MAC) 12 of 2014 awarding compensation of a sum of Rs.6,82,422/- along with 6% annual interest thereon to the claimant who developed 40% physical disability as a result of the road traffic accident on 10.05.2013 while he was travelling in the offending vehicle from Sonamura to Aralia Daodharani.

2. Facts of the case, in brief, are as under :

Claimant respondent Abul Kashem boarded the offending vehicle bearing registration No. TR-01-D-0582 at Tamsabari Chowmuhani, Sonamura for going to Aralia Daodharani on 10.5.2013. As a result of reckless driving of the vehicle at a very high speed, the vehicle capsized on the road. As a result, the claimant received multiple fracture injuries in his left hand and he was admitted in Sonamura Sub-Divisional Hospital from where he was first referred to Melaghar Hospital and from there to Tripura Medical College & Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital at Hapania. Stating these facts, his father Manjir Ali lodged a written FIR with the Off

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top