T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH
Prebul Kemprai – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
Judgment
T. Nandakumar Singh, J.1. Heard Mr. P.K. Roy Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned Senior PP assisted by Mr. K.P. Bhattacharjee, learned Addl. PP appearing for the respondents No. 1 & 2.
2. This criminal petition is directed against the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shillong dated 20.05.2014 passed in Sessions Case No. 6/2014. On perusal of the said order dated 20.05.2014, it is clear that the learned counsel appeared for the accused in the said Sessions Case No. 6/2014 before the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Shillong. On bare perusal of the impugned order i.e. dated 20.05.2014, it appears that Section "205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973" (for short 'Cr. P.C.') had been misquoted. The committal proceeding is under Section 209 of the Cr. P.C. After that committal proceeding, the concerned accused persons were to appear before the Court of the concerned Sessions Judge. After the committal proceeding under Section 209 of the Cr. P.C. is completed, there is no question of going back to the procedures prescribed under Section 205 of the Cr. P.C. Under the general provision for inquiries and trial u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.