SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Manipur) 63

KH.NOBIN SINGH
Laishram Nabachandra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:L. Shashibhushan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:K. Jagat, Govt. Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Kh. Nobin Singh, J.

1. Heard Shri L. Shashibhushan, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner and Shri K. Jagat, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondents.

2.1. According to the petitioner, he was initially appointed as Investigator on ad-hoc basis for a period of 6 (six) months in the Planning Section (Nucleus Cell), Department of Commerce and Industries vide order dated 20-10-1984 issued by the Director of Industries, Government of Manipur along with three others and his ad-hoc service was extended from time to time. Later on, in terms of the policy decision of the State Government for regularisation of ad-hoc services vide Office Memorandum dated 31-05-1986, the ad-hoc appointment of the petitioner was regularised to the post of Investigator (Nucleus Cell) vide order dated 24-09-1986 issued by the Director of Industries, Government of Manipur.

2.2. While the petitioner along with three others were serving as Investigators, the State Government accorded sanction to the re-designation of the post of Investigator as Statistical Supervisor (Nucleus Cell) vide order dated 05-11-1999 issued by the Deputy Secretary (Com.& Ind.), Government of Manipur. The petitioner











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top