KELLER – Appellant
Versus
U S, (1909) – Respondent
[213 U.S. 138, 139] Section 3 of the act of Congress of February 20, 1907 (34 Stat. at L. 898, 899, chap. 1134, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1907, pp. 389, 392), entitled An Act to Regulate the Immigration of Aliens into the United States, reads as follows:
The plaintiffs in error were indicted for a violation of this section, the charge against them being based upon that portion of the section which is in italics, and, in terms, that they wilfully and knowingly did keep, maintain, control, support, and harbor in their certain house of prostitution (describing it), for the purpose of prostitution, a certain alien woman, to wit, Irene Bodi, who was, as they well knew, a subject of the [213 U.S. 138, 140] King of Hungary, who had entered the United States within three years. A trial was had upon this indictment; the plaintiffs in error were convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for eighteen months.
Messrs. Benjamin C. Bachrach and Elijah N. Zoline for plaintiffs in error.
[213 U.S. 138, 141] Assistant Attorney General Fowler for defendant in error.
Statement by Mr. Justice Brewer:
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:
The single question is one of constitutionality. Has Congress power to punish the offense charged, or is jurisdiction thereover solely with the state? Undoubtedly, as held, Congress has the power to exclude aliens from the United States; to prescribe the terms and conditions on which they may come in; to establish regulations for sending out of the country such aliens as have entered in violation of law, and to commit the enforcement of such conditions and regulations to executive [213 U.S. 138, 144] officers. United States ex rel. Turner v. Williams,
It is unnecessary to determine how far Congress may go in legislating with respect to the conduct of an alien while residing here, for there is no charge against one; nor to prescribe the extent of its power in punishing wrongs done to an alien, for there is neither charge nor proof of any such wrong. So far as the statute or the indictment requires, or the testimony shows, she was voluntarily living the life of a prostitute, and was only furnished a place by the def
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.