C. I. R. – Appellant
Versus
LANE-WELLS CO. , (1944) – Respondent
Mr. J. Louis Monarch, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Raphaell Dechter, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. [321 U.S. 219, 220]
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Lane-Wells Company is a transferee and successor of the taxpayer Technicraft Engineering Corporation and as such is liable for its taxes. The Commissioner, the Board of Tax Appeals,1 and the Circuit Court of Appeals2 have held that Technicraft was a personal holding company in 1934, 1935, and 1936, and that question is no longer open.
For the years named, Technicraft filed the usual corporation income tax returns on Treasury Form 1120. On this form the following appeared: Is the corporation a personal holding company within the meaning of section 351 of the Revenue Act of 1934 (or the appropriate year)? (If so, an additional return on Form 1120H must be filed.) To this each year Technicraft answered, No. In none of the years in question did it file a personal holding company return on Form 1120H. It was advised, and in good faith believed, that it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.