SPENCER VS HIBERNIA BANK, 368 U. S. 2 (1961)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SPENCER – Appellant
Versus
HIBERNIA BANK, 368 U. S. 2 (1961) – Respondent

United States Supreme Court
SOERGEL v. ALLEN, (1961)
No. 117
Decided On : October 9, 1961

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 9 N. Y. 2d 633, 172 N. E. 2d 84.

Benjamin E. Shove for appellants.

Charles A. Brind, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

SPENCER v. HIBERNIA BANK, <navlink>368 U.S. 2</navlink> (1961)

U.S. Supreme Court
SPENCER v. HIBERNIA BANK, 368 U.S. 2 (1961)
368 U.S. 2
SPENCER, ADMINISTRATRIX, ET AL. v. HIBERNIA BANK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 176.
Decided October 9, 1961.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 186 Cal. App. 2d 702, 9 Cal. Rptr. 867.

M. Mitchell Bourquin and George Olshausen for appellants.

Moses Lasky and James Farraher for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [368 U.S. 2, 3]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SPENCER – AppellantVersusHIBERNIA BANK, 368 U. S. 2 (1961) – Respondent

SPENCER – Appellant
Versus
HIBERNIA BANK, 368 U. S. 2 (1961) – Respondent