SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MUTTER – Appellant
Versus
WISCONSIN, 379 U. S. 201 (1964) – Respondent



United States Supreme Court
MOITY v. LOUISIANA, (1964)
No. 337
Decided On : December 7, 1964

245 La. 546, 159 So.2d 149, reversed.

Bentley G. Byrnes for appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Garrison v. Louisiana, ante, p. 64.


MUTTER v. WISCONSIN, <NAVLINK>379 U.S. 201</NAVLINK> (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court
MUTTER v. WISCONSIN, 379 U.S. 201 (1964)
379 U.S. 201

MUTTER v. WISCONSIN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 495.
Decided December 7, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 23 Wis. 2d 407, 127 N. W. 2d 15.

Roger C. Minahan for appellant.

George Thompson, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Roy G. Tulane and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 201, 202]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top