SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.M.KOTHARI, U.B.S.BEDI
Prakash Bhalaji Bafna – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C. Khandelwal, S.U. Pathak,S.K. Rastogi

ORDER

B.M. Kothari, A.M. - This appeal by the assessee is directed against the assessment made under section 158BC read with section 158BD of the IT Act, 1961, (‘the Act’) for the block assessment period 1st April, 1985 to 10th Oct., 1995.

The assessee has raised the following grounds in this appeal :

1. On the facts and circumstances prevailing in the case and as per provision of law, it be held that invoking provisions of section 158BD is bad in law. It further be held that the case of the appellant is not covered by provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the Act. The order passed by the Assessing Officer in terms of provisions of section 158BC read with section 158BD is without jurisdiction and is vitiated. The order passed by the Assessing Officer be declared as null and void and not tenable in law.

2. Without prejudice to ground No. 1 and assuming without admitting that the case of the appellant is covered by mischief of provisions of Chapter XIV-B and Assessing Officer is within his right to proceed with the assessment in terms of provisions of the said. Chapter, on facts and circumstances of the case and as per provisions of law, it be held that the Assessing Officer erred in consideri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top